
http://market.android.com/developer?pub=TUQSoft

nippletwister wrote:Is that free to the consumer or just you? Paying for yet another device's connectivity makes it not worth it.
The man with the world's largest penis wrote:“They asked me if that’s a growth – and i said no, that’s my dick,”
WrenchHead wrote:nippletwister wrote:Is that free to the consumer or just you? Paying for yet another device's connectivity makes it not worth it.
Chrome notebook works on any wi-fi network like a normal laptop, it appears... so it wouldn't be much of an issue to not pay for cellular service.




daoist wrote:The digitizer on my Droid 1 is eating rainbows and shitting shit, so I ordered a new one.
Replacement victory speech / horror story in 4-9 days.


None of the above because they're all half-baked iPad knockoffs?nithos wrote:So, what's THE andriod tablet to get in the next 3-6 months? Toshiba?
Toilet of Sadness wrote:None of the above because they're all half-baked iPad knockoffs?nithos wrote:So, what's THE andriod tablet to get in the next 3-6 months? Toshiba?

Toilet of Sadness wrote:None of the above because they're all half-baked iPad knockoffs?nithos wrote:So, what's THE andriod tablet to get in the next 3-6 months? Toshiba?
daoist wrote:Toilet of Sadness wrote:None of the above because they're all half-baked iPad knockoffs?nithos wrote:So, what's THE andriod tablet to get in the next 3-6 months? Toshiba?
Bingo.
Though, depending on how the honeycomb port goes, I'm considering picking up a Nook Color.
The man with the world's largest penis wrote:“They asked me if that’s a growth – and i said no, that’s my dick,”
well, I guess WebKit browsers aren't all built equally, but I don't know that I would expect one or the other to handle shit web code any better.nithos wrote:I am finding that our customer portal (build with PlumTree circa 2002) doesn't play nicely with the iPad.

Gretyl wrote:bahahahah:
http://fuglyandroid.tumblr.com/
nithos wrote:Toilet of Sadness wrote:None of the above because they're all half-baked iPad knockoffs?nithos wrote:So, what's THE andriod tablet to get in the next 3-6 months? Toshiba?
I already have an iPad 2, but I need to bring in 2-3 more alternatives so I can run them through the paces before making a recommendation on which tablet will work best for our field service techs. The PlayBook is another one of the options I want to bring in house to test out.
I am finding that our customer portal (build with PlumTree circa 2002) doesn't play nicely with the iPad.

Toilet of Sadness wrote:well, I guess WebKit browsers aren't all built equally, but I don't know that I would expect one or the other to handle shit web code any better.nithos wrote:I am finding that our customer portal (build with PlumTree circa 2002) doesn't play nicely with the iPad.
welp, I guess google is now in the beetle production business (you know, that's a really shitty and strained metaphor):WrenchHead wrote:It's true if you give some people the freedom to customize things, it'll turn out looking like a nightmare. It's probably hard to beat highly paid Apple designers as well, but at least you have the freedom to do it. If Apple made cars, we'd all be driving around in white and black VW beetles that shocked you if you tried to modify them.
BusinessWeek wrote:Playtime is over in Android Land. Over the last couple of months Google (GOOG) has reached out to the major carriers and device makers backing its mobile operating system with a message: There will be no more willy-nilly tweaks to the software. No more partnerships formed outside of Google's purview. From now on, companies hoping to receive early access to Google's most up-to-date software will need approval of their plans. And they will seek that approval from Andy Rubin, the head of Google's Android group.
This is the new reality described by about a dozen executives working at key companies in the Android ecosystem. Some of those affected include LG, Toshiba, Samsung, and even Facebook, which has been trying to develop an Android device. There have been enough run-ins to trigger complaints with the Justice Dept., according to a person familiar with the matter. The Google that once welcomed all comers to help get its mobile software off the ground has become far more discriminating—especially for companies that want to include Google services such as search and maps on their hardware. Google also gives chip and device makers that abide by its rules a head start in bringing Android products to market, according to the executives.
When Android hit the scene in 2008, Google had a tantalizing pitch: Android was "open source." That is, Google would do the hard work of developing the code, and hardware and software makers were free to use the system at no charge. Carriers and device makers relished the idea of not paying royalties. Android became the people's mobile software, a free zone that contrasted with the closed worlds of the iPhone (AAPL) and BlackBerry (RIMM). HTC, Motorola (MMI), and Acer could avoid spending billions developing their own operating systems and customize Android with unique services. Carriers got a raft of slick new devices to sell. Consumers enjoyed more choice. And Google's search-advertising business could tap the vast mobile phone market.
…
Over the past few months, according to several people familiar with the matter, Google has been demanding that Android licensees abide by "non-fragmentation clauses" that give Google the final say on how they can tweak the Android code—to make new interfaces and add services—and in some cases whom they can partner with. Google's Rubin says that such clauses have always been part of the Android license, but people interviewed for this story say that Google has recently tightened its policies. Facebook, for example, has been working to fashion its own variant of Android for smartphones. Executives at the social network are unhappy that Google gets to review Facebook's tweaks to Android, say two people who weren't comfortable being named talking about the business. Google has also tried to hold up the release of Verizon (VZ) Android devices that make use of Microsoft's (MSFT) rival Bing search engine, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
It's these types of actions that have prompted the gripes to the Justice Dept., says a person with knowledge of the matter. Google spokeswoman Shari Yoder Doherty declined to comment on Google and its partners or any complaints to the government.
Google has also started delaying the release of Android code to the public, putting smaller device makers and developers at a disadvantage. On Mar. 24, Bloomberg Businessweek reported Google won't widely release Honeycomb's source code for the foreseeable future.
The company's moves are hardly unprecedented in such a fast-moving industry. Google owes it to its partners and consumers to prevent Android from running amok. And yet murmurs abound that Android's master has tightened up too much—that its policies limit licensees' ability to differentiate their products. "The premise of a true open software platform may be where Android started, but it's not where Android is going," says Nokia (NOK) Chief Executive Stephen Elop, a former Microsoft executive who recently inked a deal with his former employer instead of Google. He says he did so in part because he thought he would have more opportunity to innovate atop Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 software.
http://source.android.com/ wrote:Android is an open-source software stack for mobile devices, and a corresponding open-source project led by Google. We created Android in response to our own experiences launching mobile apps. We wanted to make sure that there was no central point of failure, so that no industry player can restrict or control the innovations of any other. That's why we created Android, and made its source code open.



Reagraham Lincool wrote:I make more money than you
Tom the Cat wrote:dude he's just soakin' his harbl


daoist wrote:It ships with a 2-foot charging cable.

Reagraham Lincool wrote:I make more money than you
Tom the Cat wrote:dude he's just soakin' his harbl
daoist wrote:The browser has occasional graphical hiccups, usually cured by switching to another tab and then back again.


The man with the world's largest penis wrote:“They asked me if that’s a growth – and i said no, that’s my dick,”


Jobu wrote:It worked pretty well on my Evo, though I can't imagine using it much. It ate through a third of my battery life after only about 20 minutes.
Reagraham Lincool wrote:I make more money than you
Tom the Cat wrote:dude he's just soakin' his harbl

Reagraham Lincool wrote:I make more money than you
Tom the Cat wrote:dude he's just soakin' his harbl

Reagraham Lincool wrote:I make more money than you
Tom the Cat wrote:dude he's just soakin' his harbl
MarcusAurelius wrote:ordered a motorola atrix. $50 online. or $200 in person
Reagraham Lincool wrote:I make more money than you
Tom the Cat wrote:dude he's just soakin' his harbl
Reagraham Lincool wrote:I make more money than you
Tom the Cat wrote:dude he's just soakin' his harbl
Return to Computers (and lesser electronics)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest