Herman Cain is a poopy shithole.

[Charlie Foxtrot]

damnit I thought this was going to be a debate on sexual harassment.

[Reagraham Lincool]

He's a bible beating, god fearing lunatic, but I doubt he's completely Klan racist. He's a closeted racist and most likely homosexual.

Speaking of which.. metaphorically, if you've eaten at Godfather's, Herman Cain has most likely molested your asshole...

Then I think Cain probably did something genuinely fucked.

[Uncle Sherm]

Yeah, I lean left and i didn't vote for Kerry.. That guy was a giant douche. I think I prefer Mitt Romney to John Kerry, honestly. I bet Howard Dean could have beat Bush even with his 'Iowa Flip-out'

I didn't vote for Kerry either - I've been active for Obama - I would be so so for Hillary

What's the difference between the three?

[WrenchHead]

Then I think Cain probably did something genuinely fucked.

That wouldn't surprise me. But lets not leave the thread without knowing Steve Deace is a piece of shit as well.

Does womanizing turn off Republican voters though? The outlandish shit that Fox News spreads around in their news propaganda and all the hot leg shots of their female staff would suggest, 'no.'

[MarcusAurelius]

Yeah, I lean left and i didn't vote for Kerry.. That guy was a giant douche. I think I prefer Mitt Romney to John Kerry, honestly. I bet Howard Dean could have beat Bush even with his 'Iowa Flip-out'

I didn't vote for Kerry either - I've been active for Obama - I would be so so for Hillary

What's the difference between the three?

fucking SERIOUSLY.

[Gretyl]

incredulity begets engagement, eh? novel tactic

[DTower5]

Yeah, I lean left and i didn't vote for Kerry.. That guy was a giant douche. I think I prefer Mitt Romney to John Kerry, honestly. I bet Howard Dean could have beat Bush even with his 'Iowa Flip-out'

I didn't vote for Kerry either - I've been active for Obama - I would be so so for Hillary

What's the difference between the three?

fucking SERIOUSLY.

Personality

[MarcusAurelius]

Yeah, I lean left and i didn't vote for Kerry.. That guy was a giant douche. I think I prefer Mitt Romney to John Kerry, honestly. I bet Howard Dean could have beat Bush even with his 'Iowa Flip-out'

I didn't vote for Kerry either - I've been active for Obama - I would be so so for Hillary

What's the difference between the three?

fucking SERIOUSLY.

Personality

is that an honest answer? because i feel like that's an honest answer, and is what i would describe as the difference.

[Uncle Sherm]

Yeah, I lean left and i didn't vote for Kerry.. That guy was a giant douche. I think I prefer Mitt Romney to John Kerry, honestly. I bet Howard Dean could have beat Bush even with his 'Iowa Flip-out'

I didn't vote for Kerry either - I've been active for Obama - I would be so so for Hillary

What's the difference between the three?

fucking SERIOUSLY.

Personality

Personality is the all the difference it takes between you not voting for one candidate and being active for another? Even when the candidate you are active for touts himself as being a vehicle for changing Washington?

[DTower5]

Yeah, I lean left and i didn't vote for Kerry.. That guy was a giant douche. I think I prefer Mitt Romney to John Kerry, honestly. I bet Howard Dean could have beat Bush even with his 'Iowa Flip-out'

I didn't vote for Kerry either - I've been active for Obama - I would be so so for Hillary

What's the difference between the three?

fucking SERIOUSLY.

Personality

Personality is the all the difference it takes between you not voting for one candidate and being active for another? Even when the candidate you are active for touts himself as being a vehicle for changing Washington?

They want leadership. They're so thirsty for it they'll crawl through the desert toward a mirage, and when they discover there's no water, they'll drink the sand.

[Reagraham Lincool]

That wouldn't surprise me. But lets not leave the thread without knowing Steve Deace is a piece of shit as well.

I'm sure that he is. In fact, the fact that he's not on national radio means he can probably get away with far worse than the typical line of racist/sexist/classist retardation that Limbaugh/Hannity/Beck/O'Reilly/Levin/Savage put out.

Does womanizing turn off Republican voters though? The outlandish shit that Fox News spreads around in their news propaganda and all the hot leg shots of their female staff would suggest, 'no.'

Titillation is as American as cheerleaders. Directly suggesting that penis go in vagina is unacceptable, however.

[WrenchHead]

Titillation is as American as cheerleaders. Directly suggesting that penis go in vagina is unacceptable, however.

[Uncle Sherm]

Personality is the all the difference it takes between you not voting for one candidate and being active for another? Even when the candidate you are active for touts himself as being a vehicle for changing Washington?

They want leadership. They're so thirsty for it they'll crawl through the desert toward a mirage, and when they discover there's no water, they'll drink the sand.

I don't see your point here. Are you one of the people that will drink sand or am I? I don't want leadership, certainly not in the form of a centralized beurocracy ever-increasingly concentrated in the hand of a single executive. I'd like to be left alone to live my life however I see fit. Someone competent to defend those simple demands from outside influence is all I ask.

We are approaching very rapidly a national debt larger than our GDP, with government spending faster than our economy is growing. This is not the time to be choosing a cult of personality. Concrete ideals and solutions are needed.

[DTower5]

Personality is the all the difference it takes between you not voting for one candidate and being active for another? Even when the candidate you are active for touts himself as being a vehicle for changing Washington?

They want leadership. They're so thirsty for it they'll crawl through the desert toward a mirage, and when they discover there's no water, they'll drink the sand.

I don't see your point here. Are you one of the people that will drink sand or am I? I don't want leadership, certainly not in the form of a centralized beurocracy ever-increasingly concentrated in the hand of a single executive. I'd like to be left alone to live my life however I see fit. Someone competent to defend those simple demands from outside influence is all I ask.

We are approaching very rapidly a national debt larger than our GDP, with government spending faster than our economy is growing. This is not the time to be choosing a cult of personality. Concrete ideals and solutions are needed.

We have the solution to stop adding to and even reducing the current debt - but you keep putting your thumbs in your ears and screaming about your island and liberty while your house burns.

[Uncle Sherm]

The solution is to spend less. At this point, simply raising taxes on the wealthiest, or even all Americans won't put a dent in the debt.

[DTower5]

The solution is to spend less. At this point, simply raising taxes on the wealthiest, or even all Americans won't put a dent in the debt.

We can do both and make it even easier... we can also create policy which would not reward companies for pushing jobs out of the United States - and don't give me any of this bullshit about how regulations are job killers - Germany manages to keep a solid manufacturing base, with good pay and benefits. It can happen - but you have to ignore the corps with a half a second.

[Uncle Sherm]

The solution is to spend less. At this point, simply raising taxes on the wealthiest, or even all Americans won't put a dent in the debt.

We can do both and make it even easier... we can also create policy which would not reward companies for pushing jobs out of the United States - and don't give me any of this bullshit about how regulations are job killers - Germany manages to keep a solid manufacturing base, with good pay and benefits. It can happen - but you have to ignore the corps with a half a second.

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=gm&v=74

Just over 7% unemployment is "good" for Germany. I think I'll pass.

http://www.worldsalaries.org/usa.shtml
http://www.worldsalaries.org/germany.shtml

And we are doing better on the income front, too.

[WrenchHead]

Saw on the news that Herman Cain's sexual harassment trial took place in September, 1999 or 9/99. ha

[DTower5]

The solution is to spend less. At this point, simply raising taxes on the wealthiest, or even all Americans won't put a dent in the debt.

We can do both and make it even easier... we can also create policy which would not reward companies for pushing jobs out of the United States - and don't give me any of this bullshit about how regulations are job killers - Germany manages to keep a solid manufacturing base, with good pay and benefits. It can happen - but you have to ignore the corps with a half a second.

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=gm&v=74

Just over 7% unemployment is "good" for Germany. I think I'll pass.

http://www.worldsalaries.org/usa.shtml
http://www.worldsalaries.org/germany.shtml

And we are doing better on the income front, too.

Those are average salaries - and they are better than US - not to mention that the 7% who are unemployed have a safety net so their children and familes are not worried about dying while looking for work. Much better than the current US situation.

[Uncle Sherm]

Those are average salaries - and they are better than US - not to mention that the 7% who are unemployed have a safety net so their children and familes are not worried about dying while looking for work. Much better than the current US situation.

Suggest you check those numbers again. Salaries are higher in the US.

http://www.indexmundi.com/germany/popul ... _line.html
15.5% below poverty line in Germany

http://www.indexmundi.com/united_states ... _line.html
15.1% in the US

[MarcusAurelius]

The solution is to spend less. At this point, simply raising taxes on the wealthiest, or even all Americans won't put a dent in the debt.

We can do both and make it even easier... we can also create policy which would not reward companies for pushing jobs out of the United States - and don't give me any of this bullshit about how regulations are job killers - Germany manages to keep a solid manufacturing base, with good pay and benefits. It can happen - but you have to ignore the corps with a half a second.

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=gm&v=74

Just over 7% unemployment is "good" for Germany. I think I'll pass.

http://www.worldsalaries.org/usa.shtml
http://www.worldsalaries.org/germany.shtml

And we are doing better on the income front, too.

Those are average salaries - and they are better than US - not to mention that the 7% who are unemployed have a safety net so their children and familes are not worried about dying while looking for work. Much better than the current US situation.

fuck you so much. while we're looking at stats, find me how many children and familes have died while looking for work.

[Reagraham Lincool]

Titillation is as American as cheerleaders. Directly suggesting that penis go in vagina is unacceptable, however.

[Reagraham Lincool]

Saw on the news that Herman Cain's sexual harassment trial took place in September, 1999 or 9/99. ha

[Gretyl]

well, it was 09/1999, but that's not as catchy

[Reagraham Lincool]

well, it was 09/1999, but that's not as catchy

Yo' format string gay as hell, bitch.